United States v. Vogan
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VARO, Judge:
Pursuant to his pleas,1 the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer members of two specifications of larceny and four specifications of attempted larceny in violation of Articles 121 and 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921 and 880 (1982). His approved sentence provides for confinement for eighteen months. At the time of his offenses and trial, the appellant was confined at the United States Disciplinary Barracks (USDB), serving a sentence from a prior general court-martial conviction.
The appellant’s offenses…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. Robert Eugene Mills and Richard Raymond PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Harry Clardy, United States of America v. Phillip Alfonso TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. SmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. VoganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. VoganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992