Legal Opinion

Rummel v. Estelle

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1980No. 78-6386PublishedCited by 1,921 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

Petitioner William James Rummel is presently serving a life sentence imposed by the State of Texas in 1973 under its “recidivist statute,” formerly Art. 63 of its Penal Code, which provided that “[wjhoever shall have been three times convicted of a felony less than capital shall on such third conviction be imprisoned for life in the penitentiary.”1 On January *26519, 1976, Rummel sought a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, arguing that life imprisonment was “grossly disproportionate” to the three felonies that formed the predicate for his…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,921 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

1,916 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API