Horwith v. City of Fresno
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the action after a demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint had been sustained without leave to amend.
Plaintiff has a license as an electrical contractor issued by the Contractors’ State License Board after he had successfully passed the examination required by that board under the provisions of sections 7000 et seq., of the Business and Professions Code.
The city of Fresno is a municipal corporation organized and existing under a city charter. An ordinance of that city requires an electrical contractor to obtain and pay for a business license…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- In Re MeansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Department of Water & Power v. Inyo Chemical Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Wilkes v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Northern California Psychiatric Society v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Agnew v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- City & County of San Francisco v. BossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.