Legal Opinion

City & County of San Francisco v. Boss

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1948No. Civ. 13519PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant, a painting contractor engaged in business in San Francisco, for unpaid license taxes for the fiscal years 1943-1944, 1944-1945, and 1945-1946. The question presented here is the validity of that portion of ordinance No. 1.075 of plaintiff city and county, requiring contractor’s licenses. The lower court found it to be invalid and sustained defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, without leave to amend. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered thereon.

The portion of the ordinance primarily involved here comprises section 76 and sections 200 to 207,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Ex Parte BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. McKay Jewelers, Inc. v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Agnew v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Pennell v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API