Legal Opinion

Agnew v. City of Culver City

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1956No. Civ. 21679PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Plaintiff brought this suit for declaratory relief to determine the validity of Ordinance Number 49, as amended by Ordinance Number 250, of the city of Culver City providing for licensing and regulating electrical contractors and fixing fees to be charged electrical contractors as a condition precedent to engaging in electrical contracting in Culver City and to determine the validity of certain provisions of Ordinance Number 170 of Culver City, as amended by Ordinance Number 230, providing for examinations before the issuance of electrical permits to do wiring, and prescribing…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. City of Bakersfield v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API