Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. County of Mendocino

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1984No. S.F. 24588PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

In this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, the trial court determined that a Mendocino County initiative ordinance prohib*480iting aerial application of phenoxy herbicides was preempted by state law and therefore invalid. The court entered summary judgment for plaintiff, the State of California. The county and a number of interveners appeal.1

In 1977 a forest products company sprayed a 500-acre tract with Phenoxy Herbicides. The drift from the spraying extended nearly three miles from the spray location, and school buses from two different school districts were…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Rubin v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API