In Re Means
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
By a writ of habeas corpus, E. H. Means seeks his discharge from custody under a warrant of arrest issued upon a complaint charging him with a violation of an ordinance of the city of Sacramento requiring that every person performing labor as a journeyman plumber procure a certificate of registration. The petitioner alleges in support of his application that at the time of his arrest he was a civil service employee of the State of California engaged in the work of a plumber at the California State Pair grounds in the city of Sacramento, and that, as such employee, the ordinance does not apply…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Johnson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Heim v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Civic Center Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Horwith v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- County of Los Angeles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Board of Trustees v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.