Legal Opinion
KOTTKES'BUS COMPANY v. Hippie
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 20, 1970No. 41844PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter has been argued on the merits, reserving for disposition a prior motion by plaintiff to dismiss the appeal.
The issue is whether an order is appealable which denies a motion for leave to file a garnishment disclosure and refuses to vacate a judgment against a garnishee, where the garnishee has appeared by counsel.
The garnishee, S. C. Osborn, was personally served on April 20, 1968. His attorney wrote letters to counsel for plaintiff on February 19 and May 1, 1968, informally advising plaintiff of the status of the contract for deed which was the subject of the garnishment. On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Barrie v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Gasser v. SpaldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Carlson v. StaffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- LaFond v. SczepanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marriage of Angelos v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of King v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Pederson v. Rose Cooperative Creamery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State of Ga. Ex Rel. Brooks v. BraswellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Carlson v. PanuskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.