Marriage of King v. Carroll
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Matthew Carroll appeals from an order denying his motion to change the custody of his children based on allegations that their present environment endangers their physical health. Respondent Frances King contends that an order denying a change of custody is nonappealable. We hold that an order denying a post-decree motion for change of custody is appealable as of right, and we affirm the order of the trial court.
FACTS
The marriage of Frances LaRaye (Carroll) King and Matthew Carroll was dissolved by decree on January 31, 1983, pursuant to a stipulation. Frances was given…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State on Behalf of Gunderson v. PreussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Marriage of Kotila v. KotilaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marriage of Angelos v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Taflin v. TaflinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Kroeplin v. HaugenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Sand v. SandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Bush Terrace Homeowners Ass'n v. RidgewayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.