Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Panuska

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 27, 1996No. CO-95-2531PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

This appeal arises out of the purchase of a parcel of real property located in Orono, Minnesota. Alan Carlson and Kingsbridge Properties, Inc. (Carlson) bought the property in 1989 from Dr. and Mrs. Harold Panus-ka (the Panuskas) with the intent of developing it into single-family homesites. Carlson filed a complaint in Hennepin County District Court on October 16,1992, alleging several causes of action based on fraud in the sale of the property. 1

Carlson moved for a default judgment on June 2, 1994, based on Minn. R. Civ. P. 37 and 41. 2 The Panuskas filed a memorandum…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marriage of Angelos v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. LYON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. Ricke's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. LaFond v. SczepanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. City of Chaska v. Chaska TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Janssen v. Best & Flanagan, LLPSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Wessin v. Archives Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Limongelli v. GAN National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API