Legal Opinion

Gasser v. Spalding

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 1925No. 24,750PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for partition commenced in 1912 and tried and submitted to Honorable Josiab D. Ensign, then one of the judges of the Eleventh judicial district, in 1913. No findings of fact and conclusions of law were ever made, but the record evidences an informal oral decision. In 1919 plaintiff’s attorneys submitted to the judge proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law which, insofar as they called for a sale of the property and a division of the proceeds, are said to have been out of harmony with the announced position of the court.

After the retirement of Judge Ensign on January 3, 1922,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heiman v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  2. Kelly v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. State v. . HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. North v. WebsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. State v. AlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Columbia Auto Works, Inc. v. YatesOregon Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API