Legal Opinion

LaFond v. Sczepanski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 11, 1966No. 39749PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment.

On January 19, 1961, action was instituted by Gayle LaFond against Albert Durand, William Durand, and Frank Sczepanski for actual damages in the sum of $15,000 and exemplary damages in the amount of $10,000 for injury sustained on July 3, 1960, as a result of an altercation. The theory of the claim was that Sczepanski had assaulted LaFond and that the Durands were at fault because they had tolerated Sczepanski on their premises after demonstration of his vicious and quarrelsome nature. The case was submitted to a jury…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tombs v. AshworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. State v. AlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Gasser v. SpaldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Croes v. HandlosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. LYON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. Ricke's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Marriage of King v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State of Ga. Ex Rel. Brooks v. BraswellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. KOTTKES'BUS COMPANY v. HippieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API