Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Isenbruck

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1952No. Civ. 14976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This action was brought by the lessors to recover from their lessee $7,500 rent claimed to be due and unpaid under the terms of a written lease. A nonsuit was granted as to a second cause of action relating to a different subject matter, and no appeal has been taken from that portion of the judgment. The answer pleaded that the covenant to pay rent had been modified, that during the term of the lease the premises became unusable for the purpose for which they were leased, that the lessors had terminated the lease, and prayed for an apportionment of rent claimed to have been prepaid. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Polack v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Johnson v. SnyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Farber v. GreenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. C. M. Staub Shoe Co. v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scott v. MullinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Stiles v. LambertAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Sierad v. LillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. In Re Buttonwood Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1972
  5. In re Jay-Norm Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API