Legal Opinion

Scott v. Mullins

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1962No. Civ. 26434PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

This is an action for declaratory relief. Plaintiffs, assignees of a sublessee, seek' to establish their right to recover prepaid rent against the sublessor and the sublessor’s assignee. The matter was tried by the judge alone upon a stipulation of facts and documentary exhibits. Judgment was in favor of plaintiff against defendant sub-lessor but in favor of the sublessor’s assignees.

The court found the facts to be substantially as follows: In June 1951 defendant Mullins, as lessee of certain real property, executed a sublease thereon to Pliillip Kay and Robert Mason. Kay and Mason built a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cicinelli v. IwasakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Baranov v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Bailey v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Western Camps, Inc. v. Riverway Ranch EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. In Re Iron-Oak Supply Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1994
  3. Allenfield Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Conner v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Maywood Mutual Water Co. No. 3 v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API