Scott v. Mullins
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.
This is an action for declaratory relief. Plaintiffs, assignees of a sublessee, seek' to establish their right to recover prepaid rent against the sublessor and the sublessor’s assignee. The matter was tried by the judge alone upon a stipulation of facts and documentary exhibits. Judgment was in favor of plaintiff against defendant sub-lessor but in favor of the sublessor’s assignees.
The court found the facts to be substantially as follows: In June 1951 defendant Mullins, as lessee of certain real property, executed a sublease thereon to Pliillip Kay and Robert Mason. Kay and Mason built a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cicinelli v. IwasakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Baranov v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Bailey v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Western Camps, Inc. v. Riverway Ranch EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- In Re Iron-Oak Supply Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1994
- Allenfield Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Conner v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Maywood Mutual Water Co. No. 3 v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.