Legal Opinion

Farber v. Greenberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1929No. Docket No. 3751PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages from defendant for being evicted by governmental authority from an apartment house occupied by him under a written lease, executed by defendant’s predecessor in ownership.

The complaint is in two causes of action. A general demurrer was interposed to each cause of action upon the ground that said complaint, and each cause of action therein set forth, did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against defendant. The trial court sustained the demurrer to both causes of action and refused to allow…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Raynor v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Van Every v. OggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Treff v. GulkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Saint v. SaintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Ayres v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Ellis v. McNeeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Morris v. OneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API