Legal Opinion
In Re Thompson
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 22, 2006No. 16-29060PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision on Debtors’ Objection to Claim Number 3 of Litton Loan Servicing 1
SUSAN V. KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge.
Is it too much to ask a consumer mortgage lender to provide the debtor with a clear and unambiguous explanation of the debtor’s default prior to foreclosing on the debtor’s house? This unfortunate chain of events began in March 2001 when Dennis and Pamela Thompson (the “Debtors”) filed their first chapter 13 case. The Debtors’ plan was confirmed in June 2001. In September of that year, the mortgage creditor, Provident Bank d/b/a PCFS Financial Services (“Provident”), filed a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wayne Johnson v. Waddell & Reed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Integra Bank/Pittsburgh v. FreemanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Maxwell v. Fairbanks Capital Corp. (In Re Maxwell)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- MorEquity, Inc. v. NaeemDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Ploog v. HomeSide Lending, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Payne v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (In Re Payne)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Miller v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Laskowski)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
- In Re FitchUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008
- Fitch v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
- Wentz v. Saxon Mortgage (In Re Wentz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008