Wayne Johnson v. Waddell & Reed, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Wayne Johnson, proceeding as a pro se litigant, was sanctioned $800 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 for persisting in the prosecution of a diversity suit that did not meet the $50,000 amount in controversy requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1332. In imposing the sanctions, the district court did not comply with the then-newly amended requirements of Rule 11. A Rule 59(e) review of the sanctions was granted, and the district court ultimately let the sanctions order stand. This appeal concerns only the propriety of the imposition of sanctions, 1 and we reverse and vacate the sanctions order of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Teamsters Local No. 579 v. B & M Transit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Racich v. Mid Continent Builders Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
3Cited by46 opinions
- Robert N. Corley and Vera M. Corley v. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. Of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Hunter v. Earthgrains Co. BakeryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- William T. Divane, Jr. v. Krull Electric Co., Inc., and John J. Curry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Dailey v. Vought Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Thornton v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.