Legal Opinion

Wayne Johnson v. Waddell & Reed, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 25, 1996No. 94-3167PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Per curiam

Wayne Johnson, proceeding as a pro se litigant, was sanctioned $800 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 for persisting in the prosecution of a diversity suit that did not meet the $50,000 amount in controversy requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1332. In imposing the sanctions, the district court did not comply with the then-newly amended requirements of Rule 11. A Rule 59(e) review of the sanctions was granted, and the district court ultimately let the sanctions order stand. This appeal concerns only the propriety of the imposition of sanctions, 1 and we reverse and vacate the sanctions order of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Teamsters Local No. 579 v. B & M Transit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Racich v. Mid Continent Builders Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Robert N. Corley and Vera M. Corley v. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. Of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Hunter v. Earthgrains Co. BakeryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  3. William T. Divane, Jr. v. Krull Electric Co., Inc., and John J. Curry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Dailey v. Vought Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. Thornton v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API