Legal Opinion

Amen, Inc. v. Barnard

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1997No. 96-81PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

Appellants, Amen, Inc. (Amen) and PCM, Inc. (PCM), filed suit against appellee, Thomas E. Barnard (Barnard), seeking to quiet title and for declaratory judgment concerning Amen’s rights of redemption to property Barnard bought at foreclosure. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Barnard, holding that Amen failed to timely redeem the property under the provisions in effect at the time the property was mortgaged.

We affirm summary judgment and grant Barnard costs and attorney’s fees associated with defending this appeal.

I. ISSUES

We decline to enumerate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cotton v. BrowWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Century Ready-Mix Co. v. Lower & Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Osborn v. PainterWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Phifer v. PhiferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Sutherland v. BockWyoming Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hodgins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Basolo v. GoseWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dorsett v. MooreWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Stonham v. WidiastutiWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Williams v. DietzWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API