Legal Opinion

Basolo v. Gose

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2000No. 99-3PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Steven Carlo Basolo (Basolo) appeals from the district court’s denial of his various pro se motions filed after our decision in the domestic relations case of Basolo v. Basolo, 907 P.2d 348 (Wyo.1995). Because Basolo’s brief is not in accordance with our rules of appellate procedure and does not contain pertinent authority or cogent argument, we summarily affirm the district court’s decision. Basolo merely reargues the earlier case. We find his appeal without merit and award costs and attorney’s fees to the mother, now known as Dulcinda Ann Gose (Gose).

ISSUES

Appellant Basolo…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Basolo v. BasoloWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Kipp v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Amen, Inc. v. BarnardWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. E.C. Cates Agency, Inc. v. BarbeWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Conner v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, NATRONAWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Woods v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Hodson v. SturgeonWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Montoya v. Navarette-MontoyaWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API