Legal Opinion

Dorsett v. Moore

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2003No. 02-98PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant Frank W. Dorsett (Dor-sett) challenges the portion of a district court judgment that required him to reimburse a neighboring landowner, appellee Tim Moore (Moore), for one-half of the cost of rebuilding a partition fence. Dorsett claims the district court erred in applying estoppel against him. We disagree and affirm.

ISSUES

[IT 2] Dorsett presents one issue for our review:

Did the trial court err when it sustained the objection by the plaintiff that defendant was estopped by his conduct from complaining that the fence plaintiff had built between the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Big Piney Oil & Gas Co. v. WYOMING OIL & GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSIONWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stadtfeld v. StadtfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Squaw Mountain Cattle Co. v. BowenWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Fred PetschCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  5. Hillard v. MarshallWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hayzlett v. HayzlettWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Carnahan v. LewisWyoming Supreme Court · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API