Legal Opinion

Williams v. Dietz

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2000No. 98-328PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Cherokee Williams appeals from the district court’s order which found that she failed to establish that an oral contract existed between her and her ex-husband, Ap-pellee Jerome Dietz, Jr.

We affirm.

ISSUE

Williams presents her issue on appeal in the form of a declaratory statement: “That the district court erred in finding that there was not a contract.”

FACTS

Dietz and Williams were married for twenty-one years. They divorced in September of 1992. Williams contends that, prior to filing for the divorce, the couple entered into an oral agreement concerning the marital…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Combs v. Sherry-CombsWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Davis v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Wyoming Sawmills, Inc. v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Willowbrook Ranch, Inc. v. Nugget Exploration, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dewey v. WentlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Heywood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Beeman v. BeemanWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Carroll v. BergenWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Arnold v. DayWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API