Legal Opinion

Phifer v. Phifer

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1993No. 92-86PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Chief Justice.

We must decide whether evidence is present in the record to support the district court’s determination that a child was not emancipated so as to relieve the husband, John Clarence Phifer, of the obligation to make child support payments, whether the district court abused its discretion in not reducing the amount of the child support payments, and whether the district court erred in requiring the husband to pay a portion of the attorney’s fees for the wife, Kathryn A. Phifer. We must also address a claim for costs, fees, and a penalty under W.R.A.P. 10.05.

We affirm.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Broyles v. BroylesWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hinckley v. HinckleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Redman v. RedmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Edwards v. EdwardsWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Foster v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stadtfeld v. StadtfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hodgins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Amen, Inc. v. BarnardWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Stonham v. WidiastutiWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API