Legal Opinion

Cotton v. Brow

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1995No. 95-32PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Michael Cotton appeals from the declaratory judgment which extinguished his interest in a contract for deed.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Cotton sets forth three questions for our review in his brief which he entitled “Peremptory Writ of Error”:

1. Did the District Court [err] in its failure to acknowledge Michael Cotton’s Sui Juris Status which was declared and affirmed?

2. Did the District Court [err] in its failure to act Sua Sponte to protect Michael Cotton’s Rights in its fictitious presumption that Michael Cotton was bound by the same rules and procedures of all other Parties In…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gookin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Booth v. Magee Carpet CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Nicholaus v. NicholausWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. DB v. State, Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Glover v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wyoming Community College Commission v. Casper Community College DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. OPERATION SAVE AMERICA v. City of JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Hirschfield v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Weller v. WellerWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Pawlowski v. PawlowskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API