Legal Opinion
Chandler v. Roche
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 19, 2002No. CIV.A. 01-1606(RMU)PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The pro se plaintiff, Phillip C. Chandler, alleges an ongoing conspiracy by the defendants to remove him from the D.C. Air Force National Guard (“AFNG”). The plaintiff claims that the defendants, in their official and individual capacities, violated his rights under the Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Wright v. Foreign Service Grievance BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Budik v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Brown v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Abou-Hussein v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Moore v. CastroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.