Legal Opinion
Budik v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 5, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0329PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
This case, in which the pro se plaintiff, Edith Budik, filed a complaint against the defendants, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (“Dartmouth-Hitchcock”) and retired Colonel (“Col.”) Steven M. Princiotta, M.D., alleging violations of certain Army regulations, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, Title YII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) (2006), misrepresentation, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, is currently before the Court on Defendant…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Budik v. AshleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- ['Mizell v. Suntrust Bank']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Lattisaw v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Braun v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.