Legal Opinion

In Re Coffey

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1992No. SB-91-0020-D. Disc. Comm. Nos. 87-0245, 88-0608 and 88-0984PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Justice.

JURISDICTION

This is a State Bar disciplinary proceeding. The State Bar filed two complaints, charging a total of twenty ethical violations, against Respondent in connection with his representation of three clients. Because Respondent failed to answer the first complaint, its allegations were deemed admitted pursuant to Rule 53(c)(1), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S. [hereinafter Rule —]. Respondent filed an answer to the second complaint, admitting all of its allegations. The Hearing Committee recommended that Respondent be reprimanded and ordered to pay…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re LincolnArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, CardenasArizona Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re ShannonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re AugensteinArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re FeeArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Matter of HigginsArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re AugensteinArizona Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API