Legal Opinion

In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Anderson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1990No. SB-89-0031-DPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

The Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona (Commission) recommends that respondent, Thomas Walter Anderson, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, ordered to pay $5,000 in restitution and $908.60 in costs to the Arizona State Bar (Bar). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S. Sup.Ct. Rules, Rule 53(e).

II. FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The facts are not in dispute. In March 1985, respondent undertook representation of Jim Jamison in a malpractice action against two Arizona attorneys. Jamison’s Flagstaff attorney,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, CardenasArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, MyersArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re CoffeyArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Matter of GaynesArizona Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API