Matter of Higgins
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZLAKET, Justice.
The disciplinary commission has recommended that respondent be retroactively suspended for ethical violations relating to three clients and for his failure to cooperate with the state bar’s investigation into these and two other matters. The hearing committee suggested only probation. Both respondent and the bar have appealed. We have appropriate jurisdiction. See Rule 53(e), Ariz. R.Sup.Ct.
In disciplinary cases, this court is the final arbiter of both fact and law. In re Neville, 147 Ariz. 106, 108, 708 P.2d 1297, 1299 (1985). Because significant differences exist…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re LincolnArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of SpearArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, TarletzArizona Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. McGrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re AlcornArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, BemisArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- In the Matter of Richard Alcorn and Steven FeolaArizona Supreme Court · 2002