Legal Opinion
Achte/Neunte Boll Kino Beteiligungs Gmbh & Co. v. Does 1-4,577
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 10, 2010No. Civil Action 10-453 (RMC)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Achte/Neunte Boll Kino Beteiligungs Gmbh & Co. is the owner of the copyright of the motion picture “Far Cry.” Plaintiff brought this suit for copyright infringement against John Does 1-4,577, individuals who allegedly illegally downloaded and distributed “Far Cry” over the Internet. When the suit was filed, Plaintiff did not know the names of the alleged infringers, but had identified the Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses of the computers associated with the infringement. In order to discover the actual names of the Doe…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Arista Records LLC v. John Does 1-19District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Linder, David v. Calero-PortocarreroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- United States v. KennedyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- First Time Videos, LLC v. Does 1-500District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Call of the Wild Movie, LLC v. DOES 1-1,062District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- First Time Videos, LLC v. Does 1-76District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1-6District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1-5District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.