Legal Opinion
Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1-5
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 12, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-0873PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are motions to dismiss, quash, and for protective orders filed by 119 putative defendants. 1 These individuals have yet to be named as defendants in this case, but claim to have received notices from their Internet Service Providers (hereinafter “ISPs”) that plaintiff Voltage Pictures, LLC seeks their identifying information in connection with allegations in the Complaint that certain IP addresses used a file-sharing program called BitTorrent to download and distribute illegally the plaintiffs copyrighted movie The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Arista Records LLC v. John Does 1-19District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Digital Sin, Inc. v. Does 1-176District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- First Time Videos, LLC v. Does 1-500District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Pacific Century International, Ltd. v. John Does 1-37District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- First Time Videos, LLC v. Does 1-76District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. DOES 1-188District Court, N.D. California · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.