Legal Opinion

Shorewood, Inc. v. Standring

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1943No. 29027PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was instituted by Shorewood, Inc., a corporation, against G. L. Standring and wife, on or about May 15, 1941, to recover damages from defendants. The right to such recovery is based upon claimed breaches, on the part of defendants, of a certain contract made and entered into by the parties November 6, 1939. The provisions of the contract, in so far as material, and the general facts surrounding the making of the contract, are set out in Standring v. Mooney, 14 Wn. (2d) 220, 127 P. (2d) 401.

The complaint in the present action contains six purported causes of action. In its first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grammer v. Skagit Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Irons Investment Co. v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Standring v. MooneyWashington Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Erwin v. Cotter Health CentersWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Erwin v. Cotter Health Centers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Stewart v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. H. O. Meyer Drilling Co. v. Alton v. Phillips Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Main v. TaggaresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API