Legal Opinion

Erwin v. Cotter Health Centers, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2007No. 78928-2PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Petitioners James F. Cotter and Cotter Health Centers challenge a Court of Appeals decision affirming the award to respondents Carey D. Erwin and Healthcare Properties, Inc., of fees arising from the leasing of several of Cotter’s senior health care (SHC) facilities. Cotter argues that Erwin provided real estate broker services to Cotter; that the parties’ contractual choice of Washington law is ineffective and California, not Washington law, should govern their dispute; and that under California law, Erwin is prohibited from claiming the leasing fees because Erwin was not licensed in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Jones v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re Estate of JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. McKee v. AT & T CORP.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. McKee v. AT&T Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Coneff v. AT & T CORP.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Schnall v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Schnall v. AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 2011

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API