Legal Opinion
Spencer v. Deems
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1919No. Civ. No. 2978PublishedCited by 7 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BARDIN, J., pro tem.
The appeal is from the judgment. The record before us for review consists of the judgment-roll alone. Plaintiffs had judgment for the cancellation of a deed and a promissory note, together with other equitable relief, upon the alleged fraud of the defendant.
The facts, as they appear in the pleadings and findings, may be stated to be substantially as follows: In November, 1914, James F. Spencer and his wife, Minnie, were the owners of a residence lot and dwelling thereon situate in the city of Pomona, California, of the value of four thousand three hundred dollars, which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Davis v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Richards v. Farmers' & Merchants' BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bohn v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Robison v. KatzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Simmons v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Appliance Co. v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Wilson v. ShultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.