Legal Opinion

Boomer v. Southern California Edison Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1928No. Docket No. 5330PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAHN, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict for the plaintiffs for damages suffered by reason of the destruction by fire of certain household furnishings belonging to the plaintiffs and located in a dwelling occupied by them as their home.

The complaint alleges that the defendant without right or permission so to do attached its “high-powered electric service wires” to plaintiffs’ house for the purpose of serving electric energy to a house located upon an adjacent lot; that the said wires were so defectively, negligently and carelessly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William Simpson Construction Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Cobe v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Schoonover v. BirnbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Casetta v. United States Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. NobletteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Arkansas Power Light Company v. BollenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Appliance Co. v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Boomer v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API