Gaume v. Sheets
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. J. W. Curtis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
This is an action by a vendor to quiet title against his vendees. The defendants, in their answer and cross-complaint, set out certain arrangements and contracts entered into by the defendant and one Wells at the time of the execution of the contract of sale and as a part of the transaction. Portions of the answer were stricken out and evidence in support of defendants’ claims was objected to by plaintiff and objection sustained. For the purpose of this decision we will, assume the facts to be as stated by the defendants in those portions of the answer stricken out. Upon such assumption it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Bray v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Phelps v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Easton v. CresseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by16 opinions
- Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Krobitzsch v. MiddletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- United Farmers' City Market, Inc. v. DonofrioArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Hollingsworth v. RuckmanMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re Marriage of BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.