Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Budzier

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1925No. Docket No. 164PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Palmer Brothers, payees, for value and before maturity, transferred by indorsement, qualified' by the words “without recourse,” to plaintiffs, private bankers, what purported to be the negotiable promissory note of defendant, Budzier. Sued on the note in justice’s court, defendant on oath denied execution, adding also to such denial:

“And if his signature appears on any note held by. Palmer Bros., or the plaintiff herein, it was procured by trickery, fraud and misrepresentations.”

At the trial in the circuit court, testimony for defendant was to the effect that the note was a forgery, or, if…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. LinaburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Goonen v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Borden v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Van Slyke v. RooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. First National Bank v. DealMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. CIT Corporation v. PanacCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. McLean v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Soberg v. SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Bancredit, Inc. v. BetheaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Eastern Acceptance Corp. v. KavlickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API