CIT Corporation v. Panac
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
In this action on two negotiable promissory-notes by the plaintiff, a holder in due course, against defendants as makers, the latters ’ defense of fraud by an agent of the payee in the execution of the notes was sustained by the trial court sitting without a jury.
The court found that defendants are husband and wife; that they are illiterate, being unable to read or write the English language, and William Hart the agent of the payee knew of that fact; that Hart gained the trust and confidence of defendants and secured their signatures to the notes by false representations which induced the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bedell v. HerringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Yakima Valley Bank v. McAllisterWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Utah State National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- DeCamp v. HammaOhio Supreme Court · 1876
- Charles Nelson Co. v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Havas v. AlgerNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- McLean v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Fleming v. KaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.