Legal Opinion

Goonen v. Ann Arbor Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1922No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Sample (George W.), J. Case by Nicholas Goonen against the Ann Arbor Railroad Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff, an adult deaf-mute, on Hill street crossing in Ann Arbor, in the day time, was struck by a passenger train of defendant and injured. There was no gate or flagman at the crossing which is about 2,000 feet south of the station, from which the train was proceeding at the rate of 12 miles per hour. Counsel agree upon the rate of speed, although the testimony on the subject is not harmonious. Plaintiff was familiar with the locality. He walked along Hill street on the sidewalk which ended some 30 or 40 feet from the track. The intervening space was wet and muddy. He picked his way…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fike v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Gardiner v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Pelton v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Emery v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. King v. Ford River Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Company v. SeamonMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Harris v. Castile Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Alley v. KlotzMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Yacobian v. VartanianMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Soberg v. SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API