Legal Opinion

Borden v. Clark

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1873PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Kent Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Cheistiancy, Ch. J.

This was an action brought by Clark, as endorsee, against-Borden, as tbe maker of a promissory note. The note was' *411made payable to the order of one French, who sold and endorsed it to the plaintiff, before maturity, the endorsement being “without recourse.”

The note being admitted and read in evidence, the plaintiff rested.

The defendant then proposed to show ■ in defense, in pursuance of a notice under the general issue, that the note was given for the purchase by him from French, the payee, of an interest in a patent-right, called the “Universal Seed Sower,” which French…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Evans v. Freeman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Downs v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. Merchants National Bank v. BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Hammond Lumber Co. v. KearsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Groat v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API