UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwayne Keith FITZEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
Dwayne Keith Fitzen appeals pro se the district court’s partial denial of his Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion for return of property seized during the investigation by state and federal officials leading to his trial and conviction in federal court of various drug trafficking offenses. The district court refused to order return of the property on the ground that Fitzen’s remedy, if any, lay in state court. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
In the summer of 1991, a joint state/federal task force began investigating Fitzen. Members of the task force…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Richard Lee MillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Van CauwenbergheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Fernando Francis, United States of America v. Clara Francis, and Fernando FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. William FreedmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Justin GladdingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Robert KahreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- State v. AgeeNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- United States v. Thomas Kriesel, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.