Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas Kriesel, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 2013No. 11-30197PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge Schroeder.
Dissent by Judge Reinhardt.
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
Government and commercial entities enjoy increasing capacity to obtain, store, and analyze information about people, giving rise to increasing concerns about privacy. Nowhere is that upward spiral more evident than in litigation, like this case, calling into question practices relating to identifying people through their deoxyribo-nucleic acid (DNA) sequences.
The appellant here, Thomas Kriesel, pled guilty to a drug conspiracy charge, and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment followed by a term of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Karen H. Amerson, United States of America v. Julius GravesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. BuzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- United States v. Justin GladdingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Haskell v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- IN RE GRAND JURY WITNESS G.B. v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Andrew Harrison Kramer v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.