Legal Opinion
United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2008No. 05-55354, 05-10067, 05-15006PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge THOMAS.
ORDER AND SUPERSEDING
OPINION
ORDER
The petitions for panel rehearing are GRANTED. The opinion and dissent filed on December 27, 2006, are withdrawn. The superseding opinion and dissenting opinion of Judge Thomas will be filed concurrently with this order.
The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot. Further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the United States may retain evidence it seized from Major League Baseball’s drug…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Demaree v. PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- HK Systems, Inc. v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Casa Orlando Apartments, Ltd. v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.