Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Lee Mills
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 20, 1993No. 92-10245PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Richard Lee Mills pled guilty to bank robbery in January of 1992. The district court ordered him to make restitution to the victim banks, and also ordered that $2,400 seized from Mills at the time of arrest be applied to the restitution obligation. The district court denied Mills’ motion brought pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) seeking the return of the 12,40o. 1
Mills appeals from the denial of his Rule 41(e) motion, arguing (1) that the district court’s restitution order was invalid because the court did not consider the financial needs of Mills’ child as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Jeffrey Wayne DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated December 10, 1987. Does I Through IV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jerry D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Van CauwenbergheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- United States v. MarolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Terence Philip Ramsden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. PierreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Curtis COMER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Randy Lee VanhornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.