Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Kahre
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 5, 2013No. 09-10471, 09-10528, 09-10529PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellants Robert Kahre (Kahre), Lori Kahre (Lori) and Alexander Loglia (Log-lia) challenge their convictions for various criminal tax offenses arising from their use of gold and silver coins to pay wages and thus avoid the reporting of payroll and income taxes due. Appellants contend that dismissal of the indictments was warranted because Appellants lacked the requisite notice that their conduct violated applicable tax laws. Appellants also assert that a new trial was in order because the prosecutor should have been disqualified due to his status as a defendant in a Bivens 1 lawsuit…
3Cases cited45 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Donald Wanland, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Todd FriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Sha-Ron HainesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. David WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Narsan LingalaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.