Legal Opinion
United States v. William Freedman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 15, 1971No. 26566PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying appellant’s Rule 41(e), F.R.Crim.P., motions for the return of property wrongfully seized.
FACTS
Inasmuch as substantially all of the essential facts are stated in the opinion on the previous appeal, Freedman v. United States, 421 F.2d 1293 (9th Cir. 1970), we shall limit our statement to the bare essentials.
Following the seizure of appellant’s property in the criminal proceeding, including the $13,100.00 here in question, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, on December 23, 1968, caused an assessment to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- John Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Isaac Welsh v. United States of America, Alice C. Welsh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Robert E. Field v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Lowell Thompson v. United States of AmerciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Simpson v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Wilfried Van CauwenbergheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Van CauwenbergheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Fernando Francis, United States of America v. Clara Francis, and Fernando FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United Sand and Gravel Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.