Ex Parte Watson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Charles M. Watson, Jr., County Attorney for Greenwood County, (“Petitioner”), seeks a declaratory judgment as to whether nonlawyer title abstractors engage in the unauthorized practice of law when they conduct a title search and report the title status in connection with a tax foreclosure sale. We hold that such activities constitute the unauthorized practice of law and must either be conducted or supervised by an attorney.
Factual/Procedural Background
Before selling a property at a tax foreclosure sale, tax collectors must provide notice of the sale to the property owner and any lien holders.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- In Re Unauthorized Practice of Law RulesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Doe v. McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- In Re LesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Slack v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Boone v. Quicken Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Slack v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005