Doe v. McMaster
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER WITHDRAWING ORIGINAL OPINION AND SUBSTITUTING SUBSEQUENT OPINION ON REHEARING
2Per curiam
Opinion No. 25508, filed August 5, 2002, is hereby withdrawn and the following opinion substituted.
s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J. s/ James E. Moore, J. s/ John H. Waller, Jr., J. s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J. s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J. JUSTICE BURNETT:
John Doe (“Doe”), a lawyer, petitioned this Court in its original jurisdiction to determine whether his business association with a lender bank (“Lender”) and a title insurance company (“Title Company”) constitutes the unauthorized practice of law in violation of Rule 5.5(b), of…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- In Re Unauthorized Practice of Law RulesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP. v. FrazerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Brown v. CoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Roberts v. LaConeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Doe Law Firm v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.