Legal Opinion

Doe v. McMaster

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 18, 2003No. 25508PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER WITHDRAWING ORIGINAL OPINION AND SUBSTITUTING SUBSEQUENT OPINION ON REHEARING

2Per curiam

Opinion No. 25508, filed August 5, 2002, is hereby withdrawn and the following opinion substituted.

s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J. s/ James E. Moore, J. s/ John H. Waller, Jr., J. s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J. s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J. JUSTICE BURNETT:

John Doe (“Doe”), a lawyer, petitioned this Court in its original jurisdiction to determine whether his business association with a lender bank (“Lender”) and a title insurance company (“Title Company”) constitutes the unauthorized practice of law in violation of Rule 5.5(b), of…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  2. State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. In Re Unauthorized Practice of Law RulesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP. v. FrazerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Brown v. CoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Roberts v. LaConeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Doe Law Firm v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API