Legal Opinion

In Re Lester

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 10, 2003No. 25605PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent and Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an agreement pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, in which respondent admits misconduct and agrees to accept an admonition or a public reprimand. We accept the agreement and issue a public reprimand.

According to the facts stated in the agreement, respondent represented the purchaser in a real estate transaction. Respondent was out of town on the date of the closing.

Prior to leaving town, respondent caused to be prepared a HUD-1 settlement statement, as well as several other closing documents, which he personally reviewed. However,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. In the Matter of EaslerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boone v. Quicken Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. Ex Parte WatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. In Re SpellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. In re FosterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API