Legal Opinion
Boone v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 19, 2017No. Appellate Case No. 2013-002288; Opinion No. 27727PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE KITTREDGE:
We accepted this declaratory judgment matter in our original jurisdiction to determine if Respondents/Petitioners Quicken Loans, Inc. (Quicken Loans) and Title Source, Inc. (Title Source) have engaged in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL).1 In their complaint, Petitioners/Respondents Vance L. and Thelma Boone, Travis G. and Theresa S. Messex, and Brian and Kelli Johnson (collectively “Homeowners”), alleged the residential mortgage refinancing model implemented by Quicken Loans and Title Source in refinancing the Homeowners’ mortgage loans constitutes UPL. In addition to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Hagan & Van Camp, P.S. v. Kassler Escrow, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- In re Shoe Manufacturers Protective Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- In Re Unauthorized Practice of Law RulesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Daniel, At. Gen. v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In the Matter of Anonymous Applicant for Admission to the South Carolina BarSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2022
- U.S. Bank National Association v. Frances L. MackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2025
- Viscuso v. Quicken Loans IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022