Legal Opinion

In Re Unauthorized Practice of Law Rules

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 21, 1992PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

In June 1991 the South Carolina Bar through a special subcommittee of the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee (Committee) submitted to the Supreme Court a set of proposed rules governing the unauthorized practice of law (Proposed Rules). This comprehensive set of Proposed Rules represents the Committee’s collective wisdom accumulated during its thirteen years of existence, as well as the efforts of the special subcommittee which spent over a year drafting these rules. The Proposed Rules attempt to define and delineate the practice of law, and to establish clear guidelines so that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Daniel, At. Gen. v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. COSTA AND SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. LongCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. SeabornSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. SossamonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Petition of BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Linder v. Insurance Claims Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. DespainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Doe v. McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Brown v. CoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API